Jump to  

Human Rights Violated by Climate Change

by Adam Shake · 12 comments

maldives sea level rise Human Rights Violated by Climate Change

The UN Human Rights Council has adopted a resolution proposed by the Maldives to hold a panel discussion on the relationship between human rights and climate change.

The resolution states that “Global warming violates human rights of millions of people, especially in countries vulnerable to climate change such as the low-lying island state of the Maldives.”

“Climate change is one of the most serious challenges mankind has ever faced and has serious implications for the realization of human rights,” says High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay in her contribution to the Climate Thinkers Blog, an online discussion forum hosted by the Copenhagen Conference.

It is a response to a UN study in January which offered evidence that global warming undermines a number of basic rights such as food, water, shelter, health, life and self-determination.

The panel debate is to be held in Geneva in July this year, and the aim is to pressure governments to reach an agreement at the climate change negotiations in Copenhagen in December.

Saying that Climate Change or Global Warming violates human rights is all well and good, but it seems as if it is a pretty serious charge with no punitive punch. Lets face it, you shouldn’t “claim” violations with out “charging” for those violations, and I don’t foresee anyone in the near future charging the top oil executives with human rights violations.

Polluting organizations provide a service to humans. Humans consume the service they provide and the end result is that other people suffer and die. Who are the real human rights violators? We are. But if we are good at anything, we are good at denial.

We live in a society where, when a hurricane or flood damages or destroys our homes, we demand that our Government writes us a check. Since when did we become juvenile sons and daughters of Uncle Sam, demanding that he give us clothes, shelter and food like some babe in arms?

We have a personal responsibility to take take care of ourselves. There is no Constitution or Bill of Rights or Charter that says we have the right to free television, free secondary education, or a new home at Government expense if ours is destroyed.

But there is a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, wherein article #3 states “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” Article #25 goes on to say “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing and housing.”

Now let me say that even though you have the right to food, clothing and housing, you do not have the right to have them “given” to you. What you do have the right to do, is secure them.

Here is my underlying point. It is through the manipulation, consumption and improper disposal of resources that Climate Change is occurring, and it is this resulting Climate Change that “takes away” the opportunity for people to participate in their human rights. This is where the violation occurs.

Do you believe that Climate Change violates human rights? If so, who do you think is at fault?

Source: Cop15 , United Nations Human Rights

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Related posts:

  1. Permafrost, Methane, and Climate Change [VID]
  2. Obama Raises Fuel Efficiency and Reverses Bush’s Climate Change Policies
  3. Oil Executive Epiphany Leads to $125 Billion Climate Change Funding

Gaiam.com, Inc

{ 1 trackback }

Human Rights Violated by Climate Change | Bangladesh News Network
May 17, 2009 at 4:50 am

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Susan Sharma April 3, 2009 at 9:25 pm

Climate change makes us realize how interconnected our world is. Overconsumption in one part of the world deprive the other part of livelihoods due to increased natural disasters. Skewed development projects with scant regard for the ecosysytem ( eg. the ski resort projects underway in two Himalayan states of India) do not augur well for the future generations.
Civil Society must become aware and take up cudgels against short term policies which do not take into account envionment impact.

Reply

2 Eric Gruis April 4, 2009 at 1:49 pm

Definitely an interesting subject — the UN has has issued a report that walks a fine line, finding violations possible in theory but difficult to establish legally. See our blog post on the UN report: http://www.globalclimatelaw.com/2009/02/articles/climate-change-litigation/human-rightsbased-climate-change-litigation-a-new-tool-for-environmental-advocates/

Reply

3 cathy fitzgerald April 5, 2009 at 5:50 am

Yes, I think it is a human rights issue – wow, the new President of the Maldives, a former prisoner of conscience for his political views, with a tiny country is really taking the lead in the climate change debate. Go, Mohamed Nasheen http://preview.tinyurl.com/d6cqtr

Thanks Twilight

Reply

4 Jon Petherbridge April 5, 2009 at 10:15 pm

Adam says, “We have a personal responsibility to [] take care of ourselves.” What? I knew there was a reason I liked you. Another Adam gem “Since when did we become juvenile sons and daughters of Uncle Sam, demanding that he give us clothes, shelter and food like some babe in arms?” Great question, and I think the answer is best defined with the old conservative phrase (Possibly penned by Robert Heinlein – but more likely by some old Roman) “When the masses realize that they can vote themselves bread and circuses, they will.” Behold, they do. And if anyone takes the time to review the economic realities being brought on by entitlement spending (see here: http://perotcharts.com/challenges/) they will see that we are in big trouble and that it will be arriving very soon.

The sentence, put forward by Navi Pillay, is patently ridiculous. And I mean this sentence: “basic rights such as food, water, shelter, health, life and self-determination” – doesn’t make any sense. The idea that everything is to be provided for everyone because it is their human right is either adolescent utopianism, or pragmatic Marxism.

Still, if we go that way, if America and the world follow the suicide spiral of entitlement and welfare spending for the purpose of sustaining everyone’s human rights, then you can bet I’m going to put myself on Navi’s list and collect my human rights instead of working for them because I’d really rather spend my days drawing pictures and writing my memoirs than working for somebody else.

Reply

5 Adam Shake April 7, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Jon,

Thanks for the comment. I always look forward to reading what you think about our articles. Your link to the spending chart was really interesting from a “big picture” point of view re. Gov. Spending and Deficit workings.

FYI, the Sons and Daughters statement I made was most likely came from watching “Braveheart” the night before. :) But I’ll take the compliment.

Thanks Jon

Reply

6 Jon Petherbridge April 5, 2009 at 10:21 pm

Sloppy posting, sorry. I was just so excited to see you make sense. Not that you don’t often make sense. You’re a very sensible fellow. Have another beer.

Reply

7 Audie Penn April 11, 2009 at 7:21 pm

Before we begin to write policy and direct behavior we (everyone) should at least agree to the whole “global warming” argument. One man’s human right violation is another man’s human right, or so it seems today. Human Rights is no more than everyone respecting others, and showing that respect through their actions. When people use arguments to skew perception and take advantage, I believe that have chosen to give up their human rights. Don’t tread on me. When people stop talking about diversity and simply respect everyone with which the come into contact, we won’t have to worry about Human Rights. There is still too much debate, and therefore no conclusion with regard to global warming. To propose a solution to a problem that has yet to be proven is a poor choice, and will lead to changes that we cannot predict in areas that we do not understand. For example, the economic impact will do more harm to the very people you suggest you are helping. When that happens, will you stand up and take responsibility for the results you have driven, or will you blame someone else. Others have claimed, “They caused the problem; I was only trying to help.”
I appreciate your concerns, and respect you as a human being. Are you sure in your accusations? Have you exhausted all possible causes, or have you selected a possible cause that supports your philosophy? You have to decide for yourself. You have to challenge yourself to respect everyone, listen to their arguments, and present arguments that cannot be refuted. Will you meet me in the debate, or will you choose another path? The only thing at stake is Human Rights, right?

Reply

8 Adam Shake April 13, 2009 at 11:49 am

Audie,

Thank you for your comment.

I will agree to disagree with you, but I would like to add that the Global Warming argument is wrapped up. Everyone from 1st graders to top world scientists and from people sowing rice paddy’s to world leaders know that Global Warming is real. To say the argument “is still open” is like saying that we have not proven the world is round or that we landed on the moon.

I also do not believe that you think that poisoned air water and soil is a “human right.” Perhaps you can explain how trying to clean up the poisons that beset us on a daily basis is “treading” on anyone’s rights, unless perhaps you think that people have a right to pollute and harm. If that is the case, we have a whole different discussion going on.

Your response was well written and your position about respecting people is spot on. However, we can cause harm through omission and lack of knowledge. It is when you gain the knowledge that your actions, even though inadvertent, cause harm, that change must take place.

I’m open to discussion on this, if perhaps you see a flaw in my opinion. We can all teach each other and we look forward to respectful dialogue.

Reply

9 Audie Penn November 17, 2009 at 6:29 pm

You may certainly disagree, but I believe your argument is flawed. Not everyone believes or agrees that Global Warming is real. The only group to whom I would listen that you sited in your first paragraph would be the scientists of the world, and there is a divide within that group. All the rest have little or not knowledge and are only repeating what they have heard. We have seen the work of our politicians; sadly they are the last group from whom I would solicit advice.

Many scientists today are beginning to find empirical data suggesting the sun has more to do with the temperature of the earth. Some scientists will argue that to suggest carbon dioxide is the cause has no real science behind it. The tipping point may be coming with regard to science telling us that our proposed theory of global warming was misconstrued. There is evidence that global cooling is underway, and that solar activity, or the lack of solar activity is the cause.

If that happens, will people have the courage to abandon the theory or will the follow through with the proposed solution because it is politically expedient? Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. I have not seen conclusive evidence that global warming is man made, nor have I seen conclusive evidence that carbon dioxide is a cause.

The point about poisoned environments is well made, and one I believe in completely. I believe organizations have an obligation to serve the communities within which they operate, and many have done so profitably. This includes protecting the environment and population from pollutants generated in manufacturing processes.

We cannot ignore the economic impact of our decisions. I could pose an argument that those driving the carbon debate are doing so for economic gain, and those we are attempting to help are bearing the brunt of that economic system. Many millions of dollars have been gathered in the name of carbon credits. I do not like that system and find it morally bankrupt.

Thank you for the kind words regarding my response. You can attack my arguments any time. I appreciate the debate and respectfully look forward to another response.

Reply

10 Adam Shake November 18, 2009 at 1:03 am

Thank you for your well thought out and articulate comment. Your comment requires a better response than I am capable of right now,as I am just getting back from a fund raiser and it is very late in the evening. (morning) I will take the time to properly respond to your comment in the morning. But let me personally say thank you for your response.

Adam

Reply

11 Tony May 15, 2009 at 2:14 pm

A very interesting and thought provoking topic.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post: MIT: Genetically Engineered Viruses Build Green Lithium-Ion Batteries

Next post: Biochar: Black Gold for Ag, Clean Energy for Us