_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(ga); })();
Jump to  

Plan for 130 Turbine Wind Farm Moves Forward off Cape Cod

by Adam Shake · 12 comments

Off-shore Wind Farm Turbine

A $1 billion proposal to build the first massive U.S. offshore wind-power farm has moved a step closer to overcoming permit requirements in Massachusetts, and U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy is not happy.

What to do when you are a Democrat, espousing clean energy and someone wants to put a wind turbine in the middle of your ocean view? Well, if you are U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy, you play the N.I.M.B.Y. card. (Not In My Back Yard)

Cape Wind Associates LLC, a privately funded Boston-based energy company, has proposed constructing 130 wind turbines over 24 square miles (62 sq km) in Nantucket Sound, within view of the wealthy Cape Cod resort region of Massachusetts.

The project, designed to power about 400,000 homes, won tentative approval by Massachusetts authorities for a certificate that combines nine state and local permits needed to build the turbines.

Opponents — including Mr. Kennedy, say Cape Wind’s turbines would kill migrating birds, threaten the region’s lucrative tourist industry and disrupt commercial fishing. Non of these things are true however.

Its supporters, including Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick and some green groups, say the project would save millions of dollars in energy costs and help the nation reduce reliance on oil and coal.

Cape Wind won a favorable environmental review in January from the U.S. Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service, which found there would be little negative impact from the project, which would produce an average 170 megawatts.

I don’t live in Cape Cod, but if I did, I would welcome an offshore horizon filled with Wind Turbines.

What are your thoughts?

Source: Reuters Creative Commons License photo credit: phault

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Related posts:

  1. Wind Could Replace Most if Not All Coal Plants, says Interior Secretary
  2. Back to Basics: Wind Energy – What Is It Really, and How Does it Work?
  3. Google 10^100th Submission: Jellyfish Wind Appliance

Gaiam.com, Inc

{ 1 trackback }

Interesting Reading… - The Blogs at HowStuffWorks
March 15, 2009 at 11:38 pm

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Nick Aster March 14, 2009 at 1:52 pm

It’s about time this thing got off the ground. As much as i respect the kenedeys otherwise, they really held this thing back…

Reply

2 Adam Shake March 14, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Nick, agreed. The fact that the pro-coal folks have been using him as a poster child as to “why wind energy wont work”, makes this even sweeter.

Reply

3 Robin March 14, 2009 at 3:38 pm

I don’t think it would threaten the tourist industry. When I was in Ireland this past summer, they turbines were everywhere and they were very beautiful, peaceful even.

Reply

4 Richard Allan Marti Jr March 15, 2009 at 6:57 am

I am extremely excited about green energy sources expecially wind. I happen to think they are beautiful and even more so when compared to the refineries in areas like Corpus Christi, Tx.

Lets help get the obstacles out of the way this time and make this dream a reality. Coupled to the new smart grid and and conservation measures we can free ourselves from the grip of Oil.

Reply

5 Adam Shake March 15, 2009 at 6:23 pm

Richard, I agree with you on all counts. We are already making a dent, and the Obama administration looks like it’s serious about renewable energy. I just hope that we can get a foothold before the tide turns.

Adam

Reply

6 Jon Petherbridge March 15, 2009 at 3:29 pm

Sure Teddy doesn’t like it. It’s just more stuff to crash into while he’s motoring around.

I can remember a time when people were excited about hydro-electric power. These days, hydro-electric has been demonized as environmentally destructive. Dams – a once green idea gone bad.

As I consider the potential ramifications of disturbing the sea floor to build the formidable foundations needed to hold giant wind grabbing propellers, I can’t help but wonder if maybe we aren’t going to regret the eco-disturbance later. Issues like chopped-up seagulls and leaking bearing lubricants, eventual oxidation, stripping, and re-coatings, might also cause more problems than they’re worth. I reckon regular maintenance trips and the fleet of repair boats needed to keep the turbines spinning will also affect Nantucket Sound.

Although it’s tempting to describe The Cape as “the wealthy Cape Cod region of Massachusetts[,]” most Cape residents are working people, clerks, restaurateurs, builders, fisherman, teachers, etc… Just like the majority of people in the wealthy Metro DC region are. The idea that resistance to the turbines is just the selfish desire of elites is baloney. A great many ordinary people just like the ocean view as nature made it. They don’t feel the reflexive compulsion to put more man-made junk into the natural world.

Reply

7 Adam Shake March 15, 2009 at 6:18 pm

Jon

I guess building fossil fuel burning coal plants in the middle of cities that kill 120,000 Americans every year and contribute to global warming is a better idea. There is no perfect alternative, only better ones.

Adam

Reply

8 Jon Petherbridge March 16, 2009 at 1:15 am

Hey Adam,

I see you’ve got some pep.

120,00 die from coal? Mmm…

The fact is that all societies have a death rate which can be viewed as death statistics. Every person who dies gets put into a category. When we look at the year’s heart disease stats for example, we are looking at the number of folks who died from heart disease. This includes people in their golden years. Why we should worry about heart attacks when people in their nineties are having said attacks is a mystery to me, yet we do collectively worry about it.

People die. No one knows that better than you. If you want to tell me 120,000 people died from coal plants I’m going to be skeptical of the assertion that a coal free world could have prevented those deaths. After all, I know a few people who burn tobacco daily and draw the full potency of tobacco smoke directly into their lungs. They ingest this pollution deliberately and repeatedly every day for decades and most of them are still alive. My grandmother was one of these polluters/self-polluters and she lived into her early nineties. When she died it was from a cardio pulmonary issue brought on by old age and smoking. Statistically, she became a lung related death. She had to become a death statistic eventually. I don’t blame smoking. I would be even less likely to blame coal.

Look, I’m not trying to say that your plan to phase out coal must be a bad idea, I’m just not sure you’re offering a better idea and I’m not sure that Al Gore hasn’t invested his VP Pension in wind turbine manufacturing. I’m also not sure that those folks lobbying for an end to coal are doing their part by using small refrigerators and depleting their retirement plans to wire their house for direct current and a solar array. I mean, if our own back yard isn’t already cluttered with solar arrays and wind turbines, should we really be trying so hard to fill another’s yard with such things?

Having lived in the Metro area and spent a lot of time on the Cape, I can assure you that more Cape Codders live small and use solar power.

Of the Cape I can also say, that on a clear eve’s view of a coming storm, as the sun sets behind you and the horizon dims ahead, the far edge of the ocean grows darker then the sky, allowing an abeyance of the rules that fix us in our surroundings, and allowing a fortunate few to slip the limits of expectation and arrive beautifully at unknowing what’s next.

Wine helps with this revelation. Giant aluminum pinwheels do not.

Reply

9 Adam Shake March 16, 2009 at 11:21 am

Jon,

Perhaps you missed this article, Just the Facts: Bush Admin Responsible For 176,000 American Civilian Deaths

Anyway, from the article;

1. Fine particle pollution from U.S. power plants cuts short the lives of nearly 24,000 people each year, including 2,800 from lung cancer.
2. The average number of life-years lost by individuals dying prematurely from exposure to particulate matter is 14 years.
3. Hundreds of thousands of Americans suffer each year from asthma attacks, cardiac problems, and respiratory problems associated with fine particles from power plants. These illnesses result in tens of thousands of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and lost work days each year.
4. The elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease are most severely affected by fine particle pollution from power plants.
5. Power plant pollution is responsible for 38,200 non-fatal heart attacks per year.
6. People who live in metropolitan areas near coal-fired plants feel the impacts most acutely and their attributable death rates are much higher than areas with few or no coal-fired plants.
7. African Americans and Latinos suffer a higher death rate than do Caucasians, because of the high demographics within urban areas where most coal power plants are located.
8. At least 90%, or 22,000 of the deaths due to fine particle pollution could have been avoided by capping power plant sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide pollution at levels consistent with the Bush Administrations initial promises.

The “All societies have a death rate” or “People die” is a Macro argument. One that doesn’t work well. Did you know that every single person who eats a carrot will die? It’s scientifically proven.

Get ready for the giant aluminum pinwheels my old friend. They are coming.

Good to hear from you,

Adam

Reply

10 Jon Petherbridge March 16, 2009 at 1:42 pm

I was happy to re-read you cut-and-post response to my comment. After reading it (again) the same questions remain unanswered. Who is dying? How old are they? Were they perfectly healthy until they moved under the shadow of the coal cloud? Or were they already stricken with cardio disease before their exposure to coal, and then coal is believed to have fatally exacerbated their problems?

I am sorry, dear friend, that I won’t accept on faith, on blind faith, your so called death statistics for coal, but arguments for causation must be substantive or they become little more than pleas for special consideration.

Also, a conservationist understands that certain nature areas are special, that they have a special significance. That’s why we protect such areas against development and against the scars left by man as he pushes for more energy, wealth, and civilization. The view off The Cape or the islands toward Nantucket Sound is one of those significant natural treasures. It means little to you because it if far away and it is somebody else’s view. You don’t want to protect it because it will be someone else’s loss.

Again let me reiterate:

Of the Cape I can also say, that on a clear eve’s view of a coming storm, as the sun sets behind you and the horizon dims ahead, the far edge of the ocean grows darker than the sky, allowing an abeyance of the rules that fix us in our surroundings, and allowing a fortunate few to slip the limits of expectation and arrive beautifully at unknowing what’s next.

Is this sentiment meaningless to you? Surely you are a man who purports a certain sensitivity to the beauty inherent in the natural world. What does the little prose-poem above mean to Adam? Just someone else’s view over the wilderness from Katahdin?

I admire your confidence as you say “the giant aluminum pinwheels…are coming.” And maybe they are when developers manage to make their next fortune by using greenies as their propagandists. But maybe windmills are not coming. Maybe I can manage to get you up to the Cape before the view is defiled, and change your mind. We can bicycle by Teddy’s house in Hyannis and collect empties, then cash them in for pizzas and cabernet.

Reply

11 Barbara Durkin July 15, 2009 at 10:36 pm

Cape Wind is a phantom energy project using real taxpayer dollars being spent by 17 permit reviewing agencies conducting hardware specific studies of a discontinued wind turbine. The public should be outraged over this MMS review under investigation by the U.S. Office of the Inspector General.

Cape Wind is a scam, Ponzi scheme, the next Halliburton, and I hope it’s never permitted.

“This is an Antitrust Complaint alleging that an International Cartel is engaged in Market Allocation, Price Fixing and Big Rigging in Windfarm Developments in New York and Vermont, as well as other states across the nation. This Complaint was submitted by 94 concerned citizens via email to the U.S. Department of Justice, Anti-Trust Division on April 25, 2007.”

“UPC Wind Management LLC: “an American subsidiary of UPC Group”, formerly known as Wind Management LLC, founded by Brian Caffyn for U.S. developments.”

BJD editor’s note, Cape Wind is identified in this Antitrust complaint signed by 94 non-NIMBYS.

http://batr.net/cohoctonwindwatch/Windfarms-antitrust%20complaint-FINAL.d oc

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post: A Letter from 2030

Next post: The First Day of Spring, 2009 – Photo Sunday